2019.07.27 11:44:24 (1155051301715292161) from Daniel J. Bernstein, replying to "Justine Tunney (@JustineTunney)" (1154947927317475328):
Thanks for taking a look. Which code base were you starting from, and which size did you try measuring? djbsort-20180729 uses a different minmax structure with asm from @zx2c4; your approach lets the compiler do all moves, which might be better.